Center For Sustainable Energy vs National Fish And Wildlife Foundation
Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data
Verdict
Center For Sustainable Energy earns a higher Efficiency Score of 73/100 (B) compared to National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at 73/100 (B). Center For Sustainable Energy directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Center For Sustainable Energy at $0 vs National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at $0.
| Metric | Center For Sustainable Energy | National Fish And Wildlife Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency Score Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp | 73/100 (B) | 73/100 (B) |
| Program Spending Ratio % of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission) | 78.0% | 78.0%* |
| CEO Compensation | $0 | $0 |
| Revenue | $502.9M | $415.5M |
| Total Expenses | $500.9M | $386.6M |
| Total Assets | $137.1M | $2.7B |
| Category | Environment & Animals | Environment & Animals |
| Location | San Diego, California | Washington, District of Columbia |
Center For Sustainable Energy earns a higher Efficiency Score of 73/100 (B) compared to National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at 73/100 (B). Center For Sustainable Energy directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Center For Sustainable Energy at $0 vs National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at $0.