Center For Sustainable Energy vs National Fish And Wildlife Foundation
Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data
Center For Sustainable Energy (B) and National Fish And Wildlife Foundation (B) are close on the LakeQuality efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.
With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.
Verdict
Center For Sustainable Energy earns a higher Efficiency Score of 73/100 (B) compared to National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at 73/100 (B). Center For Sustainable Energy directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Center For Sustainable Energy at $0 vs National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at $0.
| Metric | Center For Sustainable Energy | National Fish And Wildlife Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency Score Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp | 73/100 (B) | 73/100 (B) |
| Program Spending Ratio % of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission) | 78.0% | 78.0%* |
| CEO Compensation | $0 | $0 |
| Revenue | $502.9M | $415.5M |
| Total Expenses | $500.9M | $386.6M |
| Total Assets | $137.1M | $2.7B |
| Category | Environment & Animals | Environment & Animals |
| Location | San Diego, California | Washington, District of Columbia |
Center For Sustainable Energy earns a higher Efficiency Score of 73/100 (B) compared to National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at 73/100 (B). Center For Sustainable Energy directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Center For Sustainable Energy at $0 vs National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at $0.