Cleveland Clinic Foundation vs Johns Hopkins University
Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data
Cleveland Clinic Foundation (A) and Johns Hopkins University (B) are close on the LakeQuality efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.
With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.
Verdict
Cleveland Clinic Foundation earns a higher Efficiency Score of 81/100 (A) compared to Johns Hopkins University at 75/100 (B). Cleveland Clinic Foundation directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Cleveland Clinic Foundation at $0 vs Johns Hopkins University at $0.
| Metric | Cleveland Clinic Foundation | Johns Hopkins University |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency Score Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp | 81/100 (A)* | 75/100 (B) |
| Program Spending Ratio % of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission) | 78.0%* | 78.0% |
| CEO Compensation | $0 | $0 |
| Revenue | $15.6B | $10.2B |
| Total Expenses | $14.8B | $8.0B |
| Total Assets | $24.7B | $20.2B |
| Category | Health | Education |
| Location | Independence, Ohio | Baltimore, Maryland |
Cleveland Clinic Foundation earns a higher Efficiency Score of 81/100 (A) compared to Johns Hopkins University at 75/100 (B). Cleveland Clinic Foundation directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Cleveland Clinic Foundation at $0 vs Johns Hopkins University at $0.