Skip to main content
NonprofitTruth

Cleveland Clinic Foundation vs Mayo Clinic Group Return

Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data

Cleveland Clinic Foundation (A) and Mayo Clinic Group Return (A) are close on the LakeQuality efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.

With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.

Verdict

Mayo Clinic Group Return earns a higher Efficiency Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Cleveland Clinic Foundation at 81/100 (A). Mayo Clinic Group Return directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Cleveland Clinic Foundation at $0 vs Mayo Clinic Group Return at $0.

MetricCleveland Clinic FoundationMayo Clinic Group Return
Efficiency Score
Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp
81/100 (A)86/100 (A)*
Program Spending Ratio
% of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission)
78.0%78.0%*
CEO Compensation$0$0
Revenue$15.6B$14.0B
Total Expenses$14.8B$13.8B
Total Assets$24.7B$17.7B
CategoryHealthHealth
LocationIndependence, OhioRochester, Minnesota

Mayo Clinic Group Return earns a higher Efficiency Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Cleveland Clinic Foundation at 81/100 (A). Mayo Clinic Group Return directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Cleveland Clinic Foundation at $0 vs Mayo Clinic Group Return at $0.

Explore More