Johns Hopkins University vs Advocate Health And Hospitals Corporation
Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data
Johns Hopkins University (B) and Advocate Health And Hospitals Corporation (A) are close on the LakeQuality efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.
With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.
Verdict
Advocate Health And Hospitals Corporation earns a higher Efficiency Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Johns Hopkins University at 75/100 (B). Advocate Health And Hospitals Corporation directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Johns Hopkins University at $0 vs Advocate Health And Hospitals Corporation at $0.
| Metric | Johns Hopkins University | Advocate Health And Hospitals Corporation |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency Score Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp | 75/100 (B) | 83/100 (A)* |
| Program Spending Ratio % of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission) | 78.0% | 78.0%* |
| CEO Compensation | $0 | $0 |
| Revenue | $10.2B | $6.9B |
| Total Expenses | $8.0B | $7.5B |
| Total Assets | $20.2B | $16.1B |
| Category | Education | Health |
| Location | Baltimore, Maryland | Downers Grove, Illinois |
Advocate Health And Hospitals Corporation earns a higher Efficiency Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Johns Hopkins University at 75/100 (B). Advocate Health And Hospitals Corporation directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Johns Hopkins University at $0 vs Advocate Health And Hospitals Corporation at $0.