Skip to main content
NonprofitTruth

Johns Hopkins University vs Trustees Of Columbia University

Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data

Johns Hopkins University (B) and Trustees Of Columbia University (B) are close on the LakeQuality efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.

With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.

Verdict

Johns Hopkins University earns a higher Efficiency Score of 75/100 (B) compared to Trustees Of Columbia University at 68/100 (B). Johns Hopkins University directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Johns Hopkins University at $0 vs Trustees Of Columbia University at $0.

MetricJohns Hopkins UniversityTrustees Of Columbia University
Efficiency Score
Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp
75/100 (B)*68/100 (B)
Program Spending Ratio
% of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission)
78.0%78.0%*
CEO Compensation$0$0
Revenue$10.2B$6.7B
Total Expenses$8.0B$6.4B
Total Assets$20.2B$23.6B
CategoryEducationEducation
LocationBaltimore, MarylandNew York, New York

Johns Hopkins University earns a higher Efficiency Score of 75/100 (B) compared to Trustees Of Columbia University at 68/100 (B). Johns Hopkins University directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Johns Hopkins University at $0 vs Trustees Of Columbia University at $0.

Explore More