Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc vs Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc (B) and Cleveland Clinic Foundation (A) are close on the LakeQuality efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.
With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.
Verdict
Cleveland Clinic Foundation earns a higher Efficiency Score of 81/100 (A) compared to Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc at 79/100 (B). Cleveland Clinic Foundation directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc at $0 vs Cleveland Clinic Foundation at $0.
| Metric | Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc | Cleveland Clinic Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency Score Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp | 79/100 (B) | 81/100 (A)* |
| Program Spending Ratio % of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission) | 78.0% | 78.0%* |
| CEO Compensation | $0 | $0 |
| Revenue | $75.1B | $15.6B |
| Total Expenses | $74.4B | $14.8B |
| Total Assets | $31.4B | $24.7B |
| Category | Health | Health |
| Location | Oakland, California | Independence, Ohio |
Cleveland Clinic Foundation earns a higher Efficiency Score of 81/100 (A) compared to Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc at 79/100 (B). Cleveland Clinic Foundation directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc at $0 vs Cleveland Clinic Foundation at $0.