Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc vs Providence Health & Services Washington
Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc (B) and Providence Health & Services Washington (B) are close on the LakeQuality efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.
With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.
Verdict
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc earns a higher Efficiency Score of 79/100 (B) compared to Providence Health & Services Washington at 77/100 (B). Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc at $0 vs Providence Health & Services Washington at $0.
| Metric | Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc | Providence Health & Services Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency Score Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp | 79/100 (B)* | 77/100 (B) |
| Program Spending Ratio % of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission) | 78.0% | 78.0%* |
| CEO Compensation | $0 | $0 |
| Revenue | $75.1B | $9.8B |
| Total Expenses | $74.4B | $10.1B |
| Total Assets | $31.4B | $8.5B |
| Category | Health | Health |
| Location | Oakland, California | Renton, Washington |
Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc earns a higher Efficiency Score of 79/100 (B) compared to Providence Health & Services Washington at 77/100 (B). Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc at $0 vs Providence Health & Services Washington at $0.