Kaiser Foundation Hospitals vs Bon Secours Mercy Health Inc
Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data
Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (B) and Bon Secours Mercy Health Inc (A) are close on the LakeQuality efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.
With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.
Verdict
Bon Secours Mercy Health Inc earns a higher Efficiency Score of 87/100 (A) compared to Kaiser Foundation Hospitals at 76/100 (B). Bon Secours Mercy Health Inc directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals at $0 vs Bon Secours Mercy Health Inc at $0.
| Metric | Kaiser Foundation Hospitals | Bon Secours Mercy Health Inc |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency Score Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp | 76/100 (B) | 87/100 (A)* |
| Program Spending Ratio % of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission) | 78.0% | 78.0%* |
| CEO Compensation | $0 | $0 |
| Revenue | $32.8B | $8.7B |
| Total Expenses | $30.7B | $9.0B |
| Total Assets | $72.1B | $12.9B |
| Category | Health | Health |
| Location | Oakland, California | Blue Ash, Ohio |
Bon Secours Mercy Health Inc earns a higher Efficiency Score of 87/100 (A) compared to Kaiser Foundation Hospitals at 76/100 (B). Bon Secours Mercy Health Inc directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals at $0 vs Bon Secours Mercy Health Inc at $0.