Kaiser Foundation Hospitals vs The New York And Presbyterian Hospital
Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data
Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (B) and The New York And Presbyterian Hospital (A) are close on the LakeQuality efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.
With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.
Verdict
The New York And Presbyterian Hospital earns a higher Efficiency Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Kaiser Foundation Hospitals at 76/100 (B). The New York And Presbyterian Hospital directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals at $0 vs The New York And Presbyterian Hospital at $0.
| Metric | Kaiser Foundation Hospitals | The New York And Presbyterian Hospital |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency Score Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp | 76/100 (B) | 83/100 (A)* |
| Program Spending Ratio % of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission) | 78.0%* | 78.0% |
| CEO Compensation | $0 | $0 |
| Revenue | $32.8B | $10.3B |
| Total Expenses | $30.7B | $9.8B |
| Total Assets | $72.1B | $20.1B |
| Category | Health | Health |
| Location | Oakland, California | New York, New York |
The New York And Presbyterian Hospital earns a higher Efficiency Score of 83/100 (A) compared to Kaiser Foundation Hospitals at 76/100 (B). The New York And Presbyterian Hospital directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Kaiser Foundation Hospitals at $0 vs The New York And Presbyterian Hospital at $0.