Skip to main content
NonprofitTruth

Mass General Brigham Incorporated And Affiliates Group Rtn vs Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data

Mass General Brigham Incorporated And Affiliates Group Rtn (A) and Cleveland Clinic Foundation (A) are close on the LakeQuality efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.

With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.

Verdict

Mass General Brigham Incorporated And Affiliates Group Rtn earns a higher Efficiency Score of 85/100 (A) compared to Cleveland Clinic Foundation at 81/100 (A). Mass General Brigham Incorporated And Affiliates Group Rtn directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Mass General Brigham Incorporated And Affiliates Group Rtn at $0 vs Cleveland Clinic Foundation at $0.

MetricMass General Brigham Incorporated And Affiliates Group RtnCleveland Clinic Foundation
Efficiency Score
Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp
85/100 (A)*81/100 (A)
Program Spending Ratio
% of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission)
78.0%78.0%*
CEO Compensation$0$0
Revenue$22.7B$15.6B
Total Expenses$21.6B$14.8B
Total Assets$26.0B$24.7B
CategoryHealthHealth
LocationSomerville, MassachusettsIndependence, Ohio

Mass General Brigham Incorporated And Affiliates Group Rtn earns a higher Efficiency Score of 85/100 (A) compared to Cleveland Clinic Foundation at 81/100 (A). Mass General Brigham Incorporated And Affiliates Group Rtn directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Mass General Brigham Incorporated And Affiliates Group Rtn at $0 vs Cleveland Clinic Foundation at $0.

Explore More