Mayo Clinic Group Return vs Providence Health & Services Washington
Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data
Verdict
Mayo Clinic Group Return earns a higher Efficiency Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Providence Health & Services Washington at 77/100 (B). Mayo Clinic Group Return directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Mayo Clinic Group Return at $0 vs Providence Health & Services Washington at $0.
| Metric | Mayo Clinic Group Return | Providence Health & Services Washington |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency Score Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp | 86/100 (A)* | 77/100 (B) |
| Program Spending Ratio % of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission) | 78.0% | 78.0%* |
| CEO Compensation | $0 | $0 |
| Revenue | $14.0B | $9.8B |
| Total Expenses | $13.8B | $10.1B |
| Total Assets | $17.7B | $8.5B |
| Category | Health | Health |
| Location | Rochester, Minnesota | Renton, Washington |
Mayo Clinic Group Return earns a higher Efficiency Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Providence Health & Services Washington at 77/100 (B). Mayo Clinic Group Return directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Mayo Clinic Group Return at $0 vs Providence Health & Services Washington at $0.