Skip to main content
NonprofitTruth

Mayo Clinic Group Return vs Stanford Health Care 227

Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data

Mayo Clinic Group Return (A) and Stanford Health Care 227 (A) are close on the LakeQuality efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.

With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.

Verdict

Mayo Clinic Group Return earns a higher Efficiency Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Stanford Health Care 227 at 86/100 (A). Mayo Clinic Group Return directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Mayo Clinic Group Return at $0 vs Stanford Health Care 227 at $0.

MetricMayo Clinic Group ReturnStanford Health Care 227
Efficiency Score
Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp
86/100 (A)86/100 (A)
Program Spending Ratio
% of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission)
78.0%*78.0%
CEO Compensation$0$0
Revenue$14.0B$7.0B
Total Expenses$13.8B$6.6B
Total Assets$17.7B$10.8B
CategoryHealthHealth
LocationRochester, MinnesotaStanford, California

Mayo Clinic Group Return earns a higher Efficiency Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Stanford Health Care 227 at 86/100 (A). Mayo Clinic Group Return directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Mayo Clinic Group Return at $0 vs Stanford Health Care 227 at $0.

Explore More