National Fish And Wildlife Foundation vs American Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals
Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data
Verdict
American Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals earns a higher Efficiency Score of 85/100 (A) compared to National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at 73/100 (B). American Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at $0 vs American Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals at $0.
| Metric | National Fish And Wildlife Foundation | American Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency Score Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp | 73/100 (B) | 85/100 (A)* |
| Program Spending Ratio % of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission) | 78.0% | 78.0%* |
| CEO Compensation | $0 | $0 |
| Revenue | $415.5M | $379.3M |
| Total Expenses | $386.6M | $355.6M |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $640.9M |
| Category | Environment & Animals | Environment & Animals |
| Location | Washington, District of Columbia | New York, New York |
American Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals earns a higher Efficiency Score of 85/100 (A) compared to National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at 73/100 (B). American Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at $0 vs American Society For The Prevention Of Cruelty To Animals at $0.