National Fish And Wildlife Foundation vs San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance
Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data
Verdict
San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance earns a higher Efficiency Score of 75/100 (B) compared to National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at 73/100 (B). San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at $0 vs San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance at $0.
| Metric | National Fish And Wildlife Foundation | San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency Score Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp | 73/100 (B) | 75/100 (B)* |
| Program Spending Ratio % of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission) | 78.0% | 78.0%* |
| CEO Compensation | $0 | $0 |
| Revenue | $415.5M | $411.0M |
| Total Expenses | $386.6M | $365.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $954.8M |
| Category | Environment & Animals | Environment & Animals |
| Location | Washington, District of Columbia | San Diego, California |
San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance earns a higher Efficiency Score of 75/100 (B) compared to National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at 73/100 (B). San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at $0 vs San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance at $0.