National Fish And Wildlife Foundation vs San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance
Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data
National Fish And Wildlife Foundation (B) and San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance (B) are close on the LakeQuality efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.
With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.
Verdict
San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance earns a higher Efficiency Score of 75/100 (B) compared to National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at 73/100 (B). San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at $0 vs San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance at $0.
| Metric | National Fish And Wildlife Foundation | San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency Score Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp | 73/100 (B) | 75/100 (B)* |
| Program Spending Ratio % of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission) | 78.0% | 78.0%* |
| CEO Compensation | $0 | $0 |
| Revenue | $415.5M | $411.0M |
| Total Expenses | $386.6M | $365.0M |
| Total Assets | $2.7B | $954.8M |
| Category | Environment & Animals | Environment & Animals |
| Location | Washington, District of Columbia | San Diego, California |
San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance earns a higher Efficiency Score of 75/100 (B) compared to National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at 73/100 (B). San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: National Fish And Wildlife Foundation at $0 vs San Diego Zoo Wildlife Alliance at $0.