Providence Health & Services Washington vs Ihc Health Services Inc
Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data
Providence Health & Services Washington (B) and Ihc Health Services Inc (A) are close on the LakeQuality efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.
With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.
Verdict
Ihc Health Services Inc earns a higher Efficiency Score of 85/100 (A) compared to Providence Health & Services Washington at 77/100 (B). Ihc Health Services Inc directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Providence Health & Services Washington at $0 vs Ihc Health Services Inc at $0.
| Metric | Providence Health & Services Washington | Ihc Health Services Inc |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency Score Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp | 77/100 (B) | 85/100 (A)* |
| Program Spending Ratio % of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission) | 78.0%* | 78.0% |
| CEO Compensation | $0 | $0 |
| Revenue | $9.8B | $9.6B |
| Total Expenses | $10.1B | $8.8B |
| Total Assets | $8.5B | $16.8B |
| Category | Health | Health |
| Location | Renton, Washington | Salt Lake Cty, Utah |
Ihc Health Services Inc earns a higher Efficiency Score of 85/100 (A) compared to Providence Health & Services Washington at 77/100 (B). Ihc Health Services Inc directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Providence Health & Services Washington at $0 vs Ihc Health Services Inc at $0.