Providence Health & Services Washington vs The Cleveland Clinic Foundation
Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data
Providence Health & Services Washington (B) and The Cleveland Clinic Foundation (B) are close on the LakeQuality efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.
With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.
Verdict
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation earns a higher Efficiency Score of 79/100 (B) compared to Providence Health & Services Washington at 77/100 (B). The Cleveland Clinic Foundation directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Providence Health & Services Washington at $0 vs The Cleveland Clinic Foundation at $0.
| Metric | Providence Health & Services Washington | The Cleveland Clinic Foundation |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency Score Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp | 77/100 (B) | 79/100 (B)* |
| Program Spending Ratio % of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission) | 78.0% | 78.0%* |
| CEO Compensation | $0 | $0 |
| Revenue | $9.8B | $7.6B |
| Total Expenses | $10.1B | $7.7B |
| Total Assets | $8.5B | $15.4B |
| Category | Health | Health |
| Location | Renton, Washington | Cleveland, Ohio |
The Cleveland Clinic Foundation earns a higher Efficiency Score of 79/100 (B) compared to Providence Health & Services Washington at 77/100 (B). The Cleveland Clinic Foundation directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Providence Health & Services Washington at $0 vs The Cleveland Clinic Foundation at $0.