Smithsonian Institute vs Canada Council For The Arts
Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data
Smithsonian Institute (B) and Canada Council For The Arts (B) are close on the LakeQuality efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.
With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.
Verdict
Canada Council For The Arts earns a higher Efficiency Score of 77/100 (B) compared to Smithsonian Institute at 73/100 (B). Canada Council For The Arts directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Smithsonian Institute at $0 vs Canada Council For The Arts at $0.
| Metric | Smithsonian Institute | Canada Council For The Arts |
|---|---|---|
| Efficiency Score Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp | 73/100 (B) | 77/100 (B)* |
| Program Spending Ratio % of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission) | 78.0% | 78.0%* |
| CEO Compensation | $0 | $0 |
| Revenue | $1.9B | $324.7M |
| Total Expenses | $1.6B | $319.7M |
| Total Assets | $7.2B | $452.1M |
| Category | Arts, Culture & Humanities | Arts, Culture & Humanities |
| Location | Washington, District of Columbia | Canada, Unknown |
Canada Council For The Arts earns a higher Efficiency Score of 77/100 (B) compared to Smithsonian Institute at 73/100 (B). Canada Council For The Arts directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Smithsonian Institute at $0 vs Canada Council For The Arts at $0.