Skip to main content
NonprofitTruth

Smithsonian Institute vs The Metropolitan Museum Of Art

Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data

Smithsonian Institute (B) and The Metropolitan Museum Of Art (B) are close on the LakeQuality efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.

With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.

Verdict

Smithsonian Institute earns a higher Efficiency Score of 73/100 (B) compared to The Metropolitan Museum Of Art at 68/100 (B). Smithsonian Institute directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Smithsonian Institute at $0 vs The Metropolitan Museum Of Art at $0.

MetricSmithsonian InstituteThe Metropolitan Museum Of Art
Efficiency Score
Composite of program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, and CEO comp
73/100 (B)*68/100 (B)
Program Spending Ratio
% of expenses going to programs (higher means more goes to mission)
78.0%78.0%*
CEO Compensation$0$0
Revenue$1.9B$761.5M
Total Expenses$1.6B$420.2M
Total Assets$7.2B$5.6B
CategoryArts, Culture & HumanitiesArts, Culture & Humanities
LocationWashington, District of ColumbiaNew York, New York

Smithsonian Institute earns a higher Efficiency Score of 73/100 (B) compared to The Metropolitan Museum Of Art at 68/100 (B). Smithsonian Institute directs 78.0% of expenses to programs. CEO compensation: Smithsonian Institute at $0 vs The Metropolitan Museum Of Art at $0.

Explore More