Skip to main content
NonprofitTruth

Smithsonian Institute vs The Metropolitan Museum Of Art

Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data

Smithsonian Institute (C) and The Metropolitan Museum Of Art (C) are close on the NonprofitTruth efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.

With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.

Reviewed by NonprofitTruth Editorial Team · Updated

Verdict

The Metropolitan Museum Of Art earns a higher Efficiency Score of 57/100 (C) compared to Smithsonian Institute at 55/100 (C), based on financial reserves, multi-year revenue consistency, and officer-comp ratio drawn from each organization's IRS Form 990. Current-officer compensation: Smithsonian Institute at $10,486,193 vs The Metropolitan Museum Of Art at $10,260,070.

MetricSmithsonian InstituteThe Metropolitan Museum Of Art
Efficiency Score
Composite of financial reserves, multi-year revenue, and officer-comp ratio
55/100 (C)57/100 (C)*
Officer Compensation
Total compensation for current officers & key employees (Form 990 Part IX, line 5)
$10,486,193$10,260,070*
Revenue$1.9B$761.5M
Total Expenses$1.6B$420.2M
Total Assets$7.2B$5.6B
CategoryArts, Culture & HumanitiesArts, Culture & Humanities
LocationWashington, District of ColumbiaNew York, New York

The Metropolitan Museum Of Art earns a higher Efficiency Score of 57/100 (C) compared to Smithsonian Institute at 55/100 (C), based on financial reserves, multi-year revenue consistency, and officer-comp ratio drawn from each organization's IRS Form 990. Current-officer compensation: Smithsonian Institute at $10,486,193 vs The Metropolitan Museum Of Art at $10,260,070.

Explore More