Skip to main content
NonprofitTruth

Sutter Bay Medical Foundation vs Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data

Sutter Bay Medical Foundation (B) and Dana Farber Cancer Institute (A) are close on the NonprofitTruth efficiency rubric. With grades this close, the choice between them turns on factors outside the rubric: mission alignment with donor priorities, program track record, or geographic focus.

With composite scores this close, the decision should weight non-financial factors: the specific program work each organization does, the geography they serve, the donor's relationship with leadership, and the marginal value of each additional dollar of funding to the organization.

Reviewed by NonprofitTruth Editorial Team · Updated

Verdict

Dana Farber Cancer Institute earns a higher Efficiency Score of 85/100 (A) compared to Sutter Bay Medical Foundation at 76/100 (B), based on financial reserves, multi-year revenue consistency, and officer-comp ratio drawn from each organization's IRS Form 990. Current-officer compensation: Sutter Bay Medical Foundation at $719,442 vs Dana Farber Cancer Institute at $9,754,379.

MetricSutter Bay Medical FoundationDana Farber Cancer Institute
Efficiency Score
Composite of financial reserves, multi-year revenue, and officer-comp ratio
76/100 (B)85/100 (A)*
Officer Compensation
Total compensation for current officers & key employees (Form 990 Part IX, line 5)
$719,442*$9,754,379
Revenue$3.5B$3.4B
Total Expenses$3.4B$3.0B
Total Assets$2.1B$4.7B
CategoryMedical ResearchMedical Research
LocationSacramento, CaliforniaBoston, Massachusetts

Dana Farber Cancer Institute earns a higher Efficiency Score of 85/100 (A) compared to Sutter Bay Medical Foundation at 76/100 (B), based on financial reserves, multi-year revenue consistency, and officer-comp ratio drawn from each organization's IRS Form 990. Current-officer compensation: Sutter Bay Medical Foundation at $719,442 vs Dana Farber Cancer Institute at $9,754,379.

Explore More