Skip to main content
NonprofitTruth
Governance & Accountability

Executive Compensation Disclosure

The Form 990 requirement that nonprofits report salaries and benefits paid to officers, directors, and highest-compensated employees.

Executive Compensation Disclosure is a term from U.S. nonprofit financial reporting — typically a line item or schedule on IRS Form 990, the annual disclosure tax-exempt organizations file. The definition here is the IRS-file usage, which can differ from how the term is used in general financial writing or accounting standards. On the LakeQuality nonprofit efficiency rubric, Executive Compensation Disclosure feeds into one of the four scoring factors (program ratio, revenue growth, reserves, or CEO compensation). Understanding how the term is computed at IRS is part of reading nonprofit pages defensibly.

Each nonprofit page on the site surfaces the specific Executive Compensation Disclosure value for that organization (when Form 990 reports one), so the general definition here translates into a concrete data point on the per-nonprofit pages you actually use.


Executive compensation disclosure is a mandatory reporting requirement on IRS Form 990 Part VII, which requires tax-exempt organizations to list the compensation paid to all officers, directors, trustees, key employees, and the five highest-compensated employees earning more than $100,000 per year. The disclosure includes base compensation, bonus and incentive payments, other reportable compensation (such as taxable fringe benefits), retirement and deferred compensation contributions, and nontaxable benefits like health insurance premiums. For organizations filing Schedule J (required when total compensation for any listed individual exceeds $150,000), additional details are required, including first-class travel, housing allowances, and club memberships. The IRS uses this data to enforce the "reasonableness" standard for nonprofit executive pay. Under IRC Section 4958, if the IRS determines that compensation constitutes an "excess benefit transaction", meaning it exceeds what would be paid for similar services by similar organizations, excise taxes can be imposed on the individual who received the excess benefit and on organization managers who approved it. The compensation-setting process is crucial: the IRS's "rebuttable presumption of reasonableness" requires that compensation be approved by an independent body, based on comparability data, and documented contemporaneously. NonprofitTruth extracts CEO compensation data directly from these disclosures to calculate compensation-to-revenue ratios and inform the Efficiency Score.


Explore

More Glossary Terms