Skip to main content
NonprofitTruth

Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc vs Mayo Clinic

Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data

Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc and Mayo Clinic are meaningfully apart on the NonprofitTruth efficiency rubric — Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc grades A while Mayo Clinic grades C. The gap usually traces to one of the three factors (financial reserves, revenue-growth consistency, or officer compensation) being substantially different at one organization versus the other.

Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc comes out ahead on the composite efficiency score. For a donor evaluating which organization to fund, the spread is large enough that the rubric-based recommendation is reasonably reliable — but it's still one input among many, not a complete answer.

Reviewed by NonprofitTruth Editorial Team · Updated

Verdict

Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc earns a higher Efficiency Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Mayo Clinic at 55/100 (C), based on financial reserves, multi-year revenue consistency, and officer-comp ratio drawn from each organization's IRS Form 990. Current-officer compensation: Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc at $90,793,859 vs Mayo Clinic at $21,062,793.

MetricKaiser Foundation Health Plan IncMayo Clinic
Efficiency Score
Composite of financial reserves, multi-year revenue, and officer-comp ratio
86/100 (A)*55/100 (C)
Officer Compensation
Total compensation for current officers & key employees (Form 990 Part IX, line 5)
$90,793,859$21,062,793*
Revenue$75.1B$7.1B
Total Expenses$74.4B$5.7B
Total Assets$31.4B$22.1B
CategoryHealthHealth
LocationOakland, CaliforniaRochester, Minnesota

Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc earns a higher Efficiency Score of 86/100 (A) compared to Mayo Clinic at 55/100 (C), based on financial reserves, multi-year revenue consistency, and officer-comp ratio drawn from each organization's IRS Form 990. Current-officer compensation: Kaiser Foundation Health Plan Inc at $90,793,859 vs Mayo Clinic at $21,062,793.

Explore More