Skip to main content
NonprofitTruth

Mayo Clinic vs Rwj Barnabas Health Inc

Side-by-side nonprofit efficiency comparison from IRS 990 data

Mayo Clinic and Rwj Barnabas Health Inc are meaningfully apart on the NonprofitTruth efficiency rubric — Mayo Clinic grades C while Rwj Barnabas Health Inc grades A. The gap usually traces to one of the three factors (financial reserves, revenue-growth consistency, or officer compensation) being substantially different at one organization versus the other.

Rwj Barnabas Health Inc comes out ahead on the composite efficiency score. For a donor evaluating which organization to fund, the spread is large enough that the rubric-based recommendation is reasonably reliable — but it's still one input among many, not a complete answer.

Reviewed by NonprofitTruth Editorial Team · Updated

Verdict

Rwj Barnabas Health Inc earns a higher Efficiency Score of 89/100 (A) compared to Mayo Clinic at 55/100 (C), based on financial reserves, multi-year revenue consistency, and officer-comp ratio drawn from each organization's IRS Form 990. Current-officer compensation: Mayo Clinic at $21,062,793 vs Rwj Barnabas Health Inc at $20,103,579.

MetricMayo ClinicRwj Barnabas Health Inc
Efficiency Score
Composite of financial reserves, multi-year revenue, and officer-comp ratio
55/100 (C)89/100 (A)*
Officer Compensation
Total compensation for current officers & key employees (Form 990 Part IX, line 5)
$21,062,793$20,103,579*
Revenue$7.1B$7.1B
Total Expenses$5.7B$7.2B
Total Assets$22.1B$9.0B
CategoryHealthHealth
LocationRochester, MinnesotaOceanport, New Jersey

Rwj Barnabas Health Inc earns a higher Efficiency Score of 89/100 (A) compared to Mayo Clinic at 55/100 (C), based on financial reserves, multi-year revenue consistency, and officer-comp ratio drawn from each organization's IRS Form 990. Current-officer compensation: Mayo Clinic at $21,062,793 vs Rwj Barnabas Health Inc at $20,103,579.

Explore More